Multimodal Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID Cognitive Impairment
https://doi.org/10.30629/2618-6667-2025-23-4-70-80
Abstract
Background: post-COVID cognitive impairment is an important medical and social problem. Many studies focus on the analysis of the characteristics of cognitive impairment after infection, but neurorehabilitation issues are rarely considered. The aim was to study the effectiveness of combined use of neuropsychological correction and rhythmic magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the rehabilitation of patients with post-COVID cognitive impairment. Patients and Methods: two groups of 20 people with postCOVID cognitive impairment were compared: group 1 underwent rehabilitation using a multimodal method, group 2 — according to the standard program. The areas of rTMS stimulation were selected based on high-quality neuropsychological diagnostics, which made it possible to identify and form the patient’s neuropsychological profile. The correction program was based on the identified neuropsychological profile and developed individually for each patient. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Frontal Area Dysfunction Battery, Clock Drawing Test, Semantic Verbal Fluency Test, 10-Word Learning, Symbolic-Digit Coding Test, Subjective Asthenia Inventory (MFI-20), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were used to assess the state of higher mental functions. Results: after correction, significant differences were found in the MoCA, 10-Word Learning, Symbolic-Digit Coding, and MFI-20 scales, with higher scores in group 1. Comparative analysis showed significant differences in score dynamics between the groups, with group 1 demonstrating better results. Conclusions: multimodal neuropsychological rehabilitation in combination with rTMS demonstrates significantly higher results compared to standard rehabilitation protocols established in the order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated July 31, 2020 No. 788n “On approval of the Procedure for organizing medical rehabilitation of adults” [1], as well as with clinical recommendations presented on the website of the Union of Rehabilitation Specialists of Russia [2–4].
About the Author
A. K. KutkovaRussian Federation
Anna K. Kutkova, graduate student, the Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, medical psychologist
St. Petersburg
References
1. Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka organizatsii meditsinskoy reabilitatsii vzroslykh: prikaz Minzdrava Rossii ot 31.07.2020 N 788n. URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/74581688/ (data obrashcheniya: 1.03.2025). (In Russ.).
2. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii «Klinicheskaya psikhologicheskaya diagnostika i reabilitatsiya patsientov s narusheniyami regulyatornykh funktsiy pri povrezhdeniyakh golovnogo mozga» (utverzhdeny na zasedanii Prezidiuma Rossiyskogo psikhologicheskogo obshchestva, Moskva, 11.12.2015; na VII mezhdunarodnom Kongresse «Neyroreabilitatsiya-2015», Moskva, 03.06.2015). M.: 2016. (In Russ.).
3. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii «Klinicheskaya psikhologicheskaya diagnostika i reabilitatsiya patsientov s apraksiyami pri povrezhdeniyakh golovnogo mozga» (utverzhdeny na zasedanii Prezidiuma Rossiyskogo psikhologicheskogo obshchestva, Moskva, 11.12.2015; na VII mezhdunarodnom Kongresse «Neyroreabilitatsiya-2015», Moskva, 03.06.2015). M.: 2016. (In Russ.).
4. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii «Klinicheskaya psikhologicheskaya diagnostika i reabilitatsiya patsientov s narusheniyami myshleniya pri povrezhdeniyakh golovnogo mozga» (utverzhdeny na zasedanii Rossiyskogo psikhologicheskogo obshchestva, Moskva, 30.05.2016; na VII mezhdunarodnom Kongresse «Neyroreabilitatsiya-2016», Moskva, 03.06.2016). M.: 2016. (In Russ.).
5. Shokina VA, Matyushkina DS, Krivonos DV, Manuvera VA, Shirokov DA, Kharlampieva DD, Lazarev VN, Pavlenko AV, Ilina EN, Rumyantsev AG, Rumyantsev SA, Ivanov KP, Khromova PA, Baklaushchev VP, Koritskiy AV, Kuropatkin VA, Moskaleva EV, Ogarkov OB, Orlova EA, Petrova AG, Pozhen’ko NS, Pushkar’ DYU, Kolontarev KB, Kolyshkina NA, Rychkova LV, Samoylov AS, Sinykov VV, Solov’eva SV, Troitskiy AV, Udalov YD, Yusubalieva GM. Humoral Immune response to linear and conformational epitopes of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Immunology. 2023;1:1–12. (In Russ.). doi: 10.330290206-4952.2023-44-1-39-52
6. Shokina VA, Krivonos DV, Manuvera VA, Kharlampieva DD, Lazarev VN, Petrova AG. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of COVID-19: current concepts. Journal Infectology. 2023;1:1–10. (In Russ.).
7. Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen S, He Q, Chang J, Hong C, Zhou Y, Wang D, Miao X, Li Y, Hu B. Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(6):683–690. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1127 PMID: 32275288; PMCID: PMC7149362.
8. Kumari N, Kumari N, Mishra S. Potential Impact of COVID-19 on Female Reproductive Health. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2023;27(1):92–96. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20220019 PMID: 35916463; PMCID: PMC10065775.
9. Levin OS. Algoritmy diagnostiki i lecheniya demencii. MEDpress-inform. 2021:192. (In Russ.).
10. Kutyakova AK, Zemlyanykh MV, Voznyuk IA. Postkovidnye kognitivnye narusheniya: misheni neyropsikhologicheskoy korrektsii. Pediatrician. 2024;15(3):77–84. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/PED15377-84
11. Mikadze YV. Methodology of neuropsychological assessment: qualitative (metasyndromal analysis of cognitive deficit structure) and quantitative (psychometric estimate) aspects. In: Psychology in Russia: State of the Art / Ed. by YuP Zinchenko, VF Petrenko. Moscow; 2011;261–267.
12. Mukhitova YV, Sel’kin MD, Gureyeva IL, Gomyakova NA. Sravnitel’nyy analiz rossiyskogo i britanskogo podkhodov v neyropsikhologicheskoy diagnostike i neyropsikhologicheskoy reabilitatsii. Uchenye zapiski SPbGMU im. I. P. Pavlova. 2017:1. (In Russ.).
13. Levin OS. Diagnostika i lechenie kognitivnykh narusheniy i dementsii v klinicheskoy praktike. M.: MEDpress-inform; 2019. (In Russ.).
14. Tokareva DV, Voznyuk IA, Ovdiienko OA, Kutyakova AK. Patent № 2825711 C1 Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Sposob lecheniya kognitivnogo defitsita infektsionnogo, sosudistogo, neyrodegeneratnivnogo geneza. Zayavl. 24.04.2023; opubl. 28.08.2024. (In Russ.).
15. Zalevskaya MA. Contemporary conditions of age groups in the russian federation International research journal. 2020;12(102). (In Russ.). doi: 10.23670/IRJ.2020.102.12.073
16. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9. doi: 10.1111/j.15325415.2005.53221.x Erratum in: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(9):1991. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15925 PMID: 15817019.
17. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000;55(11):1621–1626. doi:10.1212/wnl.55.11.1621. PMID: 11113214.
18. Balashova EY, Kovyazina MS. Neyropsikhologicheskaya diagnostika. Klassicheskie stimul’nye materialy. M.: Genezis; 2016. 18 s. s tsvet. ill. i 52 s. s cherno-bel. ill. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-98563-312-2.
19. Mikadze YV. Different approaches to neuropsychological assessment, i.e. qualitative and quantitative analysis in neuropsychological diagnostics. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, series 14. Psychology. 2012;2:96–102. (In Russ.).
20. Luriya AR. Vysshie korkovye funktsii cheloveka i ikh narusheniya pri lokal’nykh porazheniyakh mozga. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta; 1962. (In Russ.).
21. Barry D, Bates ME, Labouvie E. FAS and CFL forms of verbal fiuency differ in difficulty: a meta-analytic study. Appl Neuropsychol. 2008;15(2):97–106. doi: 10.1080/09084280802083863 PMID: 18568601; PMCID: PMC3085831.
22. Borkowski JG, Benton AL, Spreen O. Word fiuency and brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 1967;5(2):135–140. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(67)90015-2
23. Alfimova MV. Semanticheskaya verbal’naya beglost’: normativnye dannye i osobennosti vypolneniya zadaniya bol’nymi shizofreniey. Social and Clinical Psychiatry. 2010;20(3):20–25. (In Russ.).
24. Ryzhova IA. Analysis of the validity of neuropsychological tests measuring memory disorders, used in psychiatric practice Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Clinical Psychology. 2015;3(21):38–47. (In Russ.).
25. Sheridan LK, Fitzgerald HE, Adams KM, Nigg JT, Martel MM, Puttler LI, Wong MM, Zucker RA. Normative Symbol Digit Modalities Test performance in a community-based sample. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006;21(1):23–28. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2005.07.003 Epub 2005 Aug 31. PMID: 16139470.
26. Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res. 1995;39(3):315–25. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00125-o PMID: 7636775
27. Morozova MA, Potanin SS, Beniashvili AG, Burminsky DS, Lepilkina TA, Rupchev GE, Kibitov AA. Validation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale russian-language version in the general populationi. Russian journal of preventive medicine and public health. 2023;26(4):7–14. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/profmed2023260417
28. Perera T, George MS, Grammer G, Janicak PG, Pascual-Leone A, Wirecki TS. The Clinical TMS Society Consensus Review and Treatment Recommendations for TMS Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder. Brain Stimul. 2016;9(3):336–346. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.03.010 Epub 2016 Mar 16. PMID: 27090022; PMCID: PMC5612370.
Review
For citations:
Kutkova A.K. Multimodal Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID Cognitive Impairment. Psychiatry (Moscow) (Psikhiatriya). 2025;23(4):70-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30629/2618-6667-2025-23-4-70-80
JATS XML























